Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter holds up Judith, Esther, Susanna, and Miriam as examples of “perfection…by faith,” but the examples are all intensely active (risking danger, fasting, confronting rulers, refusing sexual sin); what does this suggest the author means by “faith,” and how does that compare with common evangelical instincts about faith being mainly inward trust?
Another way to ask: The chapter calls these women “perfect…by faith,” but it shows them doing brave, costly things. What does the author mean by “faith,” and how is that different from the idea that faith is mostly just inner trust?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, “faith” is not merely inward confidence but a courageous, obedient loyalty to God that acts—sometimes at great cost—and this is what he connects with “perfection.” That challenges the instinct to treat faith mainly as private trust divorced from visible obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • Judith “went into the enemy camp” and “scored all danger for her country’s sake,” yet this is described as acting “in faith in God.”
  • Esther is “weak from fasting,” but by faith she confronts power and “had the tyrant’s decree annulled.”
  • Susanna’s “surpassing modesty” is framed as faithful endurance: “unwavering martyr of chastity.”
  • Miriam’s faith shows up in leadership: “the prophet’s companion in commanding the multitude.”
  • Later counsel ties virtue to practice: people must be “taught, trained, and then given the opportunity to put the things learned into practice.”
Discussion Follow-ups If faith is measured by faithful action, what kinds of obedience today would we be tempted to label as “optional” rather than essential to faith?