Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Intimacy with God  /  Chapter 1: Bearing the Cross  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 8
“His best friend will be the Lord, and he will share the same hearth with the Spirit,” followed by being “pure in the flesh, in his heart, and in his speech.” How does the chapter connect intimacy with God to purity, and what modern Christian arguments might try to separate closeness to God from rigorous purity in body, inner life, and words?
Another way to ask: How does the chapter connect being close to God with being pure in your body, heart, and speech? What modern arguments try to say you can be close to God without strict purity in those areas?

Direct Answer The chapter ties intimacy to God with a whole-life purity: friendship with the Lord and nearness to the Spirit expresses itself in purity of body, inner desires, and speech. The transcript doesn’t list modern arguments, but it clearly refuses the idea that closeness to God can coexist with indulgence in pleasures, fantasies, or undisciplined speech.

Support from Transcript:

  • “His best friend will be the Lord, and he will share the same hearth with the Spirit.”
  • Immediately: “He will be pure in the flesh, in his heart, and in his speech.”
  • “Bearing the cross” is separating from “delights and pleasures,” implying purity is separation from corrupting pleasures.
  • Evil lures include “adulteries, fleshly pleasures, and similar alluring fantasies,” the opposite of purity.
  • The call to bring “every thought into captivity” shows purity includes inner life, not just outward acts.
Discussion Follow-ups What do you tend to excuse as “just thoughts” or “just words”? How does the transcript’s link between intimacy and purity challenge that separation?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next