Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
David Bercot concludes, “By their actions, the Puritans showed that they had no real understanding of the kingdom of God… Somehow, they never grasped the kingdom teachings of Jesus”; based on the chapter’s evidence, what specific kingdom teachings (not general ideals) were being ignored, and why might serious Bible-believing Christians miss them while still thinking they are faithful?
Another way to ask: Based on the chapter, what specific teachings of Jesus about God’s kingdom were the Puritans ignoring? Why might sincere, Bible-believing Christians still miss those teachings and think they are being faithful?

Direct Answer The chapter’s evidence points to kingdom teachings about rejecting violence and refusing to trust weapons—living differently from conquest-minded Israel models—as the specific teachings being ignored. Serious Bible-believing Christians can miss these because they can read their situation through Old Testament categories (Canaan/Philistines) while still using Bible language and thinking God approves their victories.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says they “imagined they were like the Israelites in Canaan and were being attacked by the Philistines,” showing a conquest framework.
  • The “Mystic Massacre” details show deliberate killing of “men, women, and children,” which contradicts Jesus’ kingdom way as Bercot implies.
  • He states plainly: “Somehow, they never grasped the kingdom teachings of Jesus.”
  • He ties their failure to trust: “their violent methods showed they actually trusted in their superior weapons.”
  • Their worship language after violence (Bradford’s “sweet sacrifice” and praising God) shows how they could feel faithful while acting brutally.
  • Winthrop’s earlier call to “love mercy” and “walk humbly” also stands in stark contrast to their later conduct.
Discussion Follow-ups What Bible passages or narratives most tempt Christians to interpret conflicts as permission for coercion rather than as a call to Christlike suffering?