Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
The chapter says it’s erroneous to think the Puritans came to plant a new nation, emphasizing they were English citizens under the king and hoped to be “the envy of other English colonies”; how does this motive reframe the “city upon a hill” language, and what does it expose about the temptation to use “Christian community” as a public display project?
Another way to ask: If the Puritans weren’t trying to start a new nation but to be a model English colony, how does that change what “city upon a hill” means? What does it reveal about the temptation to make “Christian community” into a public show?

Direct Answer The chapter reframes “city upon a hill” as a plan for an admired model colony within England’s world, not a new nation-building mission. It exposes how “Christian community” can become a project for admiration—wanting to look impressive—rather than a faithful community shaped by Jesus.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot calls it “erroneous” to think they came “to plant a new nation,” stressing they were “English citizens… under the authority of the king.”
  • The Massachusetts charter is described as a royal charter for a trading company, “for commercial gain,” also to extend “the king’s dominion” and “bring Christianity to the Native Americans.”
  • Bercot explains Winthrop meant that if they lived by those principles, “their colony would be the envy of other English colonies such as Virginia.”
  • He summarizes: “they, as Puritans, would show the world what a real Christian community looks like.”
  • The rest of the chapter shows the danger when the “show” remains but the ethics collapse (autocracy, violence), producing public shame instead of witness.
Discussion Follow-ups How can a desire to be admired (even for “Christian” reasons) subtly replace the hard work of justice, mercy, and humility?