Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
In God We Don't Trust  /  Chapter 23: What Was Lacking Spiritually  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 7
Bercot argues that “misrepresentations, falsehoods, and deliberate lies” stirred rebellion and singles out Samuel Adams for publishing lies and “imaginary conspiracies”; what would it look like, concretely, for Christians to “dig to get their facts right” and ensure “all sides” are heard in today’s political or church controversies?
Another way to ask: What are practical ways Christians today can check facts carefully and listen to more than one side in political or church conflicts?

Direct Answer Concretely, Bercot’s standard would mean Christians refuse to be driven by conspiracy narratives, verify claims before repeating them, seek the other side’s account, and publicly denounce known falsehood—even when the lies serve “our” cause.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says “misrepresentations, falsehoods, and deliberate lies are what stirred the colonists to armed rebellion.”
  • He calls Samuel Adams a chief example whose methods were “to publish lies and misrepresentations and to create imaginary conspiracies.”
  • He says if they “had loved truth,” they would not have “allowed themselves to be led by men like Samuel Adams.”
  • He describes the concrete alternative: “They would have dug to get their facts right,” ensured “the colonial population heard all sides of every issue,” and “denounced lying agitators.”
  • He ties truth to Christian identity: the Holy Spirit is the “Spirit of truth,” and the Christian is girded with truth.
Discussion Follow-ups What practices in our churches encourage careful truth-seeking, and what practices reward speed and outrage? When should Christians “denounce” a popular voice?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next