Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
Bercot calls it “more disturbing” that “professing Christians” were inflamed to “directly disobey their God”; what does this accusation suggest about what he believes the American church had lost (“mooring,” “power,” “trust in God”), and where might that same loss show up in today’s churches?
Another way to ask: Bercot says it’s worst that Christians were stirred up to disobey God. What does this claim say he thinks the church had lost back then, and where might we see the same problem in churches today?

Direct Answer Bercot suggests the church had become spiritually unanchored and vulnerable to political manipulation—showing it had lost “moorings,” “power,” and “trust in God,” which today could appear wherever churches treat political anger as obedience to God.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says it is “more disturbing” that “professing Christians” could be inflamed to “directly disobey their God.”
  • He calls it “a sad testimony to a Christianity that had lost its moorings, its power, and its trust in God.”
  • His context is disobedience over something minimal (“over so little”), implying spiritual weakness made them easy to mobilize.
  • He frames the core issue as disobeying God’s commands about government, not merely making a political mistake.
  • He raises a self-check: “Or am I being too harsh? After all, does Jesus really expect us to pay unfair taxes?”—implying Christians justified disobedience through moral-sounding excuses.
Discussion Follow-ups Where do we see believers justifying actions that Scripture forbids because the surrounding culture labels them “necessary” or “patriotic”?