Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
In the Gaspee Incident, the Sons of Liberty shoot a captain and burn the ship, and colonial juries “always sided with their countrymen”; what does this reveal about partiality and justice, and how might Christians today replicate the same sin by excusing wrongdoing when it’s committed by “our people”?
Another way to ask: In the Gaspee Incident, colonists hurt people and burned a ship, and juries still protected them. What does this show about biased justice, and how might Christians today excuse wrong actions when “our people” do them?

Direct Answer The transcript portrays a community so biased toward “its own” that it could not deliver justice, even for serious violence; Christians can repeat this by minimizing or defending wrongdoing when it is committed by their political or cultural allies.

Support from Transcript:

  • In the Gaspee Incident, Sons of Liberty “boarded the ship,” “shot the captain,” and “set the ship on fire”—clear, violent criminal acts.
  • Many involved were “leading citizens of Providence, Rhode Island,” yet “the colonial authorities let the men off scot-free.”
  • Bercot says the British found it “almost impossible to prosecute and punish smuggling and acts of violence because the colonial juries always sided with their countrymen.”
  • He highlights “outrageous acts such as the burning of the Gaspee” going unpunished as a pattern, not a one-off.
  • This unjust loyalty becomes a reason Parliament later changes how trials are handled.
Discussion Follow-ups What are today’s equivalents of “leading citizens” being protected from consequences? How do we tell when we’re seeking truth and justice versus protecting the reputation of “our side”?