Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
In God We Don't Trust  /  Chapter 19: The Colonists Change Their Tune  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Regarding writs (spelled “rites” in the transcript) of assistance, Bercot emphasizes they were long-standing in England and not uniquely targeting colonists, but colonial officials “turned a blind eye” and a whole seaport culture protected smugglers; how does this picture compare with early Christian assumptions about cooperation with authorities and refusal to participate in dishonest economies?
Another way to ask: If writs of assistance were normal in England and not aimed only at colonists, how should we view a culture where officials look the other way and communities protect smugglers? How does that compare to early Christian ideas about obeying authorities and not joining dishonest business?

Direct Answer Bercot presents the colonies as developing a culture that protected dishonest trade and resisted lawful enforcement, which contrasts with his implied Christian ethic of cooperation with authorities and straightforward honesty. While he doesn’t quote early Christian writers here, he does frame obedience and tax-paying as basic Christian practice.

Support from Transcript:

  • Writs/“rites of assistance” began in 1660 to search for smuggled goods; they were used in England “for more than a century.”
  • They were not specially anti-American: “weren’t something specifically aimed at the colonists.”
  • Colonial officials “normally turned a blind eye to smuggling,” so writs weren’t used much until enforcement tightened.
  • He describes coordinated evasion: news of warrants was “leaked,” merchants removed goods before inspectors arrived.
  • He says “an entire culture had developed in colonial seaports to protect smugglers.”
  • He ties the proper Christian response to taxes and authority: “If the colonists had paid back Caesar’s things to Caesar,” searches wouldn’t be needed.
Discussion Follow-ups Are there industries or social habits today where Christians “turn a blind eye” because dishonesty is normalized? What would it mean to be known as a person who doesn’t participate in shady practices, even if it costs you opportunities?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next