Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
David Bercot says presentism makes modern Christians “self-congratulatory,” assuming we are morally and doctrinally superior; where have you seen that instinct in your own church tradition, and what would genuine humility toward earlier believers actually look like in practice?
Another way to ask: Where have you seen Christians in your tradition act like we’re automatically better or smarter than earlier believers? What would real humility toward past Christians look like in how we talk and act?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that presentism tempts any church tradition to assume “we’re the ones who have it right,” so humility would look like slowing down our judgments and letting earlier Christians challenge us rather than only using them as targets.

Support from Transcript:

  • Presentism is “looking at the past through glasses of today,” leading us to conclude “today we are morally and doctrinally superior.”
  • “If the early Christians were stricter than us… they were too strict. And if we’re stricter… then they were too lax… It’s always, we’re the ones who have it right.”
  • He warns presentism makes Christians “self-congratulatory” and spiritually proud.
  • He says we should stop judging early Christians “based on our interpretation of Scripture,” and instead assess “our own beliefs in light of how the early Christians understood the Scriptures.”
  • On baptism, even if we think they were wrong, humility would say, “I can see why the early Christians held” their view because they took the verses “literally… at face value.”
Discussion Follow-ups What practices in our tradition do we defend mainly because “that’s what our group does”? How can we intentionally practice the humility of saying, “I see why they believed that,” before critiquing it?