Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 8
He reads the Apostles’ Creed and concludes that “most of the doctrines that Christians argue about today were considered…non-essentials,” adding, “our problem isn’t that we don’t believe enough, it’s that we’re dogmatic about too many things”; which doctrines your church treats as “must-believe” would likely not have been treated that way by early Christians, and what would be gained—or lost—if you loosened your grip on them?
Another way to ask: What beliefs does your church treat as “you must believe this” that early Christians may have seen as non-essential? What might you gain or lose by holding those beliefs more loosely?

Direct Answer Bercot doesn’t list which modern disputed doctrines are non-essentials, but he implies many items in long modern statements of faith go beyond early Christian “fundamentals.” Loosening our grip could reduce unnecessary division, but it may feel like losing certainty or identity tied to detailed doctrinal systems.

Support from Transcript:

  • He presents the Apostles’ Creed as “the oldest statement of faith we have,” dating “close to the time of the Apostle John.”
  • He says most listeners likely already believe it, and it reflects “what the Scriptures teach and what Christians believed at the end of the first century.”
  • He adds there may be “four or five other doctrines” early Christians viewed as fundamentals, “but that’s it.”
  • He concludes: “most of the doctrines that Christians argue about today were considered…non-essentials.”
  • He critiques modern churches’ “long, detailed doctrinal statements…30 different points,” and says, “our problem isn’t that we don’t believe enough, it’s that we’re dogmatic about too many things.”
Discussion Follow-ups Compare your church’s required beliefs to the Creed: which ones are treated as tests of faithfulness today but aren’t even mentioned in that early summary?