Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Historical Kingdom Christian Movements  /  The Novatianists  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
Bercot claims that because the Novatianists left before Constantinian corruptions, they were “largely spared” and preserved “primitive Christianity” for 500 years—what concrete separations from “church-state” values, violence, and worldliness would be required today for a community to plausibly claim the same aim, and what would your own life likely have to lose for that to be real?
Another way to ask: If a church today wanted to avoid “church-state” thinking, violence, and worldliness like the Novatianists, what clear choices would it need to make—and what would you personally have to give up for that to be real?

Direct Answer The transcript implies a community aiming at “primitive Christianity” today would need clear separation from state power, coercion, and violence, and a deliberate commitment to Jesus’ teachings as a present-kingdom way of life—even if that means losing comfort, respectability, and protection. The lesson doesn’t list modern applications directly, but the historical markers Bercot highlights point to what must be resisted.

Support from Transcript:

  • Kingdom Christians live “fairly literally” by Jesus’ teachings, especially the Sermon on the Mount, under “different… values and… laws than the world.”
  • He condemns church-state blending: Constantine paying clergy salaries made bishops “officers of the state,” the “first step toward creating a state church.”
  • He treats Christian violence as a key corruption: bishops blessing troops; Christians killing; crosses used as “military standards.”
  • He calls persecution of dissenters a major turning: making it illegal to own writings; death penalty; “beginning of the church persecuting… heretics.”
  • He says Novatianists were “largely spared” because they left before these corruptions and thus continued “Kingdom Christianity” longer.
Discussion Follow-ups What would it look like for a church to refuse political leverage and still be faithful? Personally, what might you lose—status, career options, safety, or social belonging—if you embraced a life shaped by the Sermon on the Mount in a hostile culture?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done