Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 5
Using Matthew 8 (the centurion), Finny argues that “submission generates power” and calls Jesus’ authority “submissive”; how does that reshape the way you think about authority in God’s character (Father/Son), and what would it demand of husbands and wives if it’s true?
Another way to ask: Using the centurion story, Finny says “submission creates power” and even calls Jesus’ authority “submissive.” How does that change how you think about God’s authority (Father and Son), and what would it require of husbands and wives?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, authority in God’s order is not bullying control but power that flows from being “under authority,” modeled by the Son’s glad submission to the Father; husbands should lead with “loving authority,” and wives should respond with “glad submission,” expecting spiritual fruit rather than loss.

Support from Transcript:

  • The centurion’s key insight: “I also am a man under authority,” and Jesus “marveled… ‘I have not found such great faith.’”
  • Finny’s conclusion: “Jesus’ power derives from Jesus being under authority… Submission generates power.”
  • He contrasts two kinds of authority: “a submissive kind of authority… more powerful than a bullying type of authority.”
  • He ties this to the Trinity: “the Father demonstrates loving authority… the Son… glad submission.”
  • He applies it to 1 Corinthians 11: a woman “has the ability to pray and prophesy when she takes her right place in the celestial order.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would “loving authority” look like if it’s patterned after the Father (not domination)? What would “glad submission” look like if it’s connected to power for ministry, not silence?