Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 2
Finny defined “your heart of hearts” as “the part of yourself you can’t lie to”; when you think about practices like head covering that invite “shame” and “insults from friends [and] family,” what inner voices compete inside you (reputation, comfort, theological frameworks), and what would it look like to let the “heart of hearts” be re-trained by Scripture rather than protected by self-preservation?
Another way to ask: When a practice might bring shame or insults, what voices inside you speak the loudest (reputation, comfort, your beliefs)? What would it look like to let Scripture reshape your deepest honesty instead of protecting yourself?

Direct Answer Finny’s “heart of hearts” idea suggests the deepest self often knows when Scripture is being dodged, even if our public self hides behind comfort, reputation, or a “cultural” framework. Letting it be re-trained means submitting that inner court to Scripture’s plain force, even when it leads to costly obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • He defines “heart of hearts” as “the part of yourself you can’t lie to… the deep part of you that you know what’s true and what’s not.”
  • He directly names competing pressures: those who practice head covering “will incur a lot of shame, a lot of insults from friends, from family.”
  • Their own experience included major social consequences: Laura was “the only woman in our church,” it was “scandalous,” and it “ultimately led to a split.”
  • Finny critiques a common theological escape hatch: commentaries saying “it was just for that culture,” which his wife felt “didn’t make sense with the passage.”
  • He says confidence comes from careful submission to the text: “verse by verse, line by line,” until “our heart of hearts speaks clearly.”
  • He warns that desire distorts judgment: “People lose good judgment because of what you want to be true.”
Discussion Follow-ups What explanations do you reach for first when obedience looks costly—“culture,” “symbol,” “not for today”? Finny implies those may function as self-protection rather than truth-seeking.

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next