Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
The lesson claims the early Christians held a tripartite view—spirit, soul, flesh—where the soul “lies in the middle” and chooses to align with spirit or flesh; in what ways does that framework change how you interpret inner conflict, temptation, and accountability compared to the more common “body and soul” model?
Another way to ask: The lesson says early Christians saw people as spirit, soul, and flesh, with the soul choosing which one to follow. How would that change how you understand temptation, inner struggle, and being accountable compared to the usual “body and soul” view?

Direct Answer Bercot’s tripartite framework shifts inner conflict from “my whole inner self is depraved” to a real battle where a God-given human spirit “wills to do what is right,” the flesh pulls toward pleasure and selfishness, and the soul is accountable because it chooses which side to follow.

Support from Transcript:

  • He summarizes early Christian belief: humans have “three separate elements: the Spirit, the soul, and the flesh.”
  • The human spirit is “the element of God that still dwells in fallen man,” giving “even fallen humans a conscience” and willing “to do what is right.”
  • The flesh “is drawn towards evil because of the fall,” “selfish,” and “prone” toward what pleases it.
  • The soul “lies in the middle” and “can choose” to be led by spirit or to “link itself with our fallen flesh,” explicitly “free will.”
  • He frames temptation as warfare: “The Spirit and the flesh fight to gain control of our soul.”
  • He contrasts modern teaching: many are taught only “body and soul” and that “both…are depraved,” and that “our spirit is the same thing as our soul.”
Discussion Follow-ups If the soul truly chooses, how should that affect how we counsel temptation (habits, pornography, anger) and not just blame “human nature”? How do we keep this from becoming self-reliance, given Bercot’s insistence on grace?