Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
The chapter compares tertiary and quaternary Christian sources to legal “hearsay.” In what ways might modern believers unknowingly build convictions about church history, doctrine, or practice on spiritual hearsay rather than firsthand evidence?
Another way to ask: The chapter compares some Christian sources to legal “hearsay.” How might Christians today build beliefs about church history, doctrine, or practice on secondhand information instead of firsthand evidence?

Direct Answer

According to the transcript, believers may build convictions on hearsay when they rely on authors who themselves are relying on other derivative sources rather than firsthand primary evidence. This can happen especially when repeated claims sound authoritative because many writers repeat them.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot defines tertiary sources as works “based not on primary sources, but on someone else’s books.” - He compares tertiary sources to “hearsay,” meaning evidence that “does not come from a person’s own firsthand knowledge.” - He says hearsay “is never a very good basis for discovering truth.” - He argues that many Christian works are actually “quaternary sources,” where the author has “never read any primary sources or even secondary sources.” - Such authors may write “as though he knows what he is talking about,” and readers “accept his word without question.” - He says speculation can be “repeated in dozens of books” until it “takes on the ring of truth.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript suggests that modern Christians should ask not only, “Who said this?” but also, “What firsthand evidence is it based on?”