Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 6
Bercot identifies the practice of beginning with Romans rather than Jesus as a tradition influenced by Martin Luther; how might inherited Protestant or evangelical traditions keep Christians from noticing what the New Testament itself emphasizes?
Another way to ask: Bercot says starting with Romans instead of Jesus comes from a tradition shaped by Martin Luther. How might Protestant or evangelical traditions keep Christians from seeing what the New Testament stresses most?

Direct Answer

Bercot’s point is that inherited traditions can train Christians to begin with Romans or Paul rather than with Jesus and the four gospels. The transcript does not broadly analyze Protestant or evangelical traditions, but it does say this “upside-down approach” has become a practical habit.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says, “Our upside-down approach to Scripture is a fairly new tradition.” - He identifies its beginning: “It began with Martin Luther.” - He quotes Luther’s valuation: “The Book of Romans is the chief part of the New Testament.” - Bercot says, “We may not use his exact words, but in practice we follow in his footsteps.” - He contrasts that with “a common sense approach” that begins “with the author of Christianity, Jesus Christ, not with Paul.” - He says that for salvation, this means “we begin with the four gospels.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript suggests that tradition can shape not only conclusions but also starting points. If the starting point is wrong, later interpretation may become distorted.