Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 8
The chapter says we know we are reading Scripture with a blank slate when we have “no theological system to defend” and “no prior conclusions to which Scripture must be molded.” What would it cost us personally, relationally, or church-wise to approach Scripture in that way?
Another way to ask: The chapter says we read Scripture with an open mind when we have no belief system to defend and no answer we must force the Bible to support. What might this cost us personally, in our relationships, or in our church?

Direct Answer

The transcript does not spell out personal, relational, or church-wide costs in detail, but it indicates that approaching Scripture this way is difficult because it requires admitting we have preconceptions and refusing to defend a system. It may cost us the comfort of certainty that our inherited framework is automatically correct.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says, “We can’t have a blank slate until we first admit that we don’t have one.” - He acknowledges, “It’s hard for most of us to admit we have preconceived beliefs.” - He says he would once have “vehemently denied” having preconceptions. - He defines a blank slate as having “no theological system to defend.” - He adds that it means having “no prior conclusions to which Scripture must be molded.” - He admits, “That is a very difficult state to obtain.”

Discussion Follow-ups

A group could discuss what makes this difficult: fear of being wrong, fear of disagreeing with one’s church, or fear of losing a familiar doctrinal identity.