Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Bercot says a title lawyer must examine an abstract with a “blank mental slate” rather than trying to build a case for the result the client wants. How does this analogy confront the way Christians often study Scripture in order to defend grace, obedience, faith, assurance, freedom, or salvation as they already understand them?
Another way to ask: Bercot says a title lawyer must study the records with an open mind, not just try to prove what the client wants. How does this challenge the way Christians sometimes study the Bible to defend what they already believe about grace, obedience, faith, assurance, freedom, or salvation?

Direct Answer

The analogy confronts any approach to Scripture that begins with a desired doctrinal result and then builds a case for it. The transcript specifically mentions studying salvation, but the same stated principle applies to any doctrine we approach with prior conclusions that Scripture must be made to support.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says his title clients want him to begin “with a blank mental slate.” - They do not want him to have “preconceived ideas as to what sort of title problems” he will find. - He says, “The last thing my clients want me to do is to examine title with a slanted mindset.” - A “biased, slanted title examination would be worthless to them.” - He states the principle: “To find truth, you must start with a blank slate.” - He later applies this to “a study of what the Scriptures teach about salvation.”

Discussion Follow-ups

If we study only to defend grace, obedience, faith, assurance, freedom, or salvation as already defined, we may be acting like a biased title examiner rather than a truth-seeker.