Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
Peter Hawkins and Mary Rodriguez both sincerely believe their doctrines are “what the Bible teaches,” even though they arrive at different conclusions through different church backgrounds. How should this challenge our confidence in our own denominational or evangelical assumptions, especially when we are certain that our tradition is simply “the plain meaning of Scripture”?
Another way to ask: Peter Hawkins and Mary Rodriguez both believe their views are what the Bible teaches, but they reach different answers because of their church backgrounds. How should this make us question our own church traditions, especially when we think our view is just the plain meaning of Scripture?

Direct Answer

Peter and Mary show that sincere confidence that “the Bible teaches” our view can still be shaped by the church background through which we learned to read Scripture. This should make us humble about claims that our tradition is simply the plain meaning of the text.

Support from Transcript

- Peter was raised by Assembly of God parents who “inculcated Pentecostal beliefs” in him from childhood. - As an adult, Peter “thoroughly knew” his doctrines and “could defend them quite adroitly from Scripture.” - Mary, after conversion, attended a Baptist church and learned “what the Bible teaches on various subjects.” - Both would deny default judgment: Peter says, “I believe what I do because that is what the Bible teaches,” and Mary says the same. - Yet Bercot says, “Despite their denials, Peter and Mary are classic examples” of default-judgment belief formation. - Both read Scripture “through the theological eyes of the church to which they belong.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The challenge is not to assume our beliefs are false, but to ask whether we have confused our church’s lens with Scripture itself.