Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
Bercot compares many Christians’ doctrinal beliefs to a “default judgment” in court, where one side wins because the other side never appears. What does this illustration suggest about the way God wants His people to seek truth, and where might our own beliefs have been formed without ever giving opposing biblical arguments a fair hearing?
Another way to ask: Bercot says many Christian beliefs are like a court case where one side wins because the other side never shows up. What does this teach us about how God wants us to seek truth? Where might our own beliefs have been formed without fairly hearing other Bible arguments?

Direct Answer

The illustration suggests that truth should not be sought by letting one doctrinal side win simply because no other biblical case was ever heard. The transcript does not directly state “how God wants” this done, but it urges Christians to recognize inherited assumptions and listen to Scripture without a slanted mindset.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot explains that in law, “the other side never showed up” is called “a default judgment.” - He says, “The worst lawyer in the world can win a default judgment,” showing that winning without opposition does not prove the case is true. - He applies this to doctrine: “Most Christians have acquired their doctrinal beliefs through default judgment.” - He says it is easy to convince someone of doctrines “when equal time is not allowed for an opposing set of doctrines.” - Peter and Mary each received “only one version of the Gospel” as a child or new believer.

Discussion Follow-ups

A useful question is: Which beliefs feel obvious to us mainly because we have never seriously heard the strongest biblical case against them?