Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 4
Bercot admits that he initially “fought bitterly” against the historic evidence but eventually yielded because he found early Christianity “thoroughly biblical”; what fears, loyalties, or comforts might make serious Christians resist evidence that challenges their current theology?
Another way to ask: Bercot says he first fought against the historical evidence but later accepted it because early Christianity seemed deeply biblical. What fears, loyalties, or comforts might cause sincere Christians to reject evidence that challenges their beliefs?

Direct Answer

According to the transcript, Christians may resist challenging evidence because it threatens established belief systems, denominational comfort, sectarian pride, and familiar ways of reading Scripture. Bercot presents this resistance as something he personally experienced before yielding.

Support from Transcript

- He says, “At first I fought bitterly against the things I was finding in the historic record of the church.” - He eventually yielded when he realized “how thoroughly biblical their Christianity was.” - He warns that the easiest course is to “ignore this book” and “forget that the early Christians even existed.” - He says it is easier to retreat “back to the comfort of your denomination, safely protected by its seminaries and theological literature.” - He notes that established belief systems make it “difficult for us to objectively look at early Christianity.” - He says readers may try “finding loopholes or imperfections” in his approach.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not list every possible fear, but it strongly points to comfort, pride, and prior theological commitments as barriers to receiving historical evidence.