Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot compares Protestant divisions to Corinthian carnality and asks whether our communions are acceptable to God when the body of Christ remains divided; how should Paul’s rebuke in 1 Corinthians 3:3 confront the way churches today treat division as normal or unavoidable?
Another way to ask: Bercot compares Protestant division to the problem Paul rebuked in Corinth. How should 1 Corinthians 3:3 challenge churches today that treat division as normal or impossible to avoid?

Direct Answer

Paul’s rebuke should make churches question whether division is merely an unfortunate reality or a sign of spiritual carnality. Bercot uses Corinth to suggest that Christians should not assume divided communion and denominational conflict are acceptable to God.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot asks, “If the Corinthian church couldn’t properly come together for communion because of their conflicts, are our communions acceptable to God?” - He quotes Paul: “You are still carnal; for where there are envies, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal in behaving like mere men?” - He applies this directly: “Maybe that’s what we are, carnal men and women in need of a godly rebuke.” - Earlier, he says ignoring the historic evidence will “continue to tear apart the body of Christ.” - He also says Protestants have failed to “exist together as one united body.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript does not offer a practical church-unity program here, but it does call for repentance rather than resignation. Treating division as normal may itself be part of the problem Bercot wants Christians to face.