Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
The chapter points out that five Christians all appealed to John 16:13—“The Holy Spirit will guide us to all truth”—yet arrived at different conclusions. What does this reveal about the danger of assuming that one’s personal interpretation is automatically the Spirit’s guidance?
Another way to ask: The chapter says five Christians all used John 16:13—“The Holy Spirit will guide us to all truth”—but reached different answers. What danger does this show in thinking our own Bible interpretation is always the Spirit’s guidance?

Direct Answer

Bercot uses this example to show that claiming personal guidance by the Holy Spirit does not guarantee that one has truly arrived at the truth. If different people all claim the Spirit led them but reach conflicting conclusions, then at least some of those claims must be mistaken.

Support from Transcript

- Five sincere Christians all agreed that "we don't need the early Christian writings to correctly understand Scripture" because "The Holy Spirit will guide us to all truth." - Bercot notes that although they agreed on that method, "they all had a different opinion about what was true." - He says, "Each was sure the Holy Spirit had guided him to all truth, but each had arrived at a different, 'truth.'" - He asks, "If all Christians were following the Holy Spirit's guidance to all truth, then all Christians would believe and teach the same things, wouldn't they?" - He points to division into "over 22,000 different denominations and sects, all with differing beliefs."

Discussion Follow-ups

The danger is confusing confidence, sincerity, or private conviction with actual guidance from the Spirit.