Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
Bercot argues that early Christians were in a better position than we are to claim that their teachings, practices, and ordinances came from the apostles. How should this affect the weight we give to early Christian writings compared with later theological systems or contemporary church preferences?
Another way to ask: Bercot says early Christians were closer to the apostles and had a better reason to say their teachings and practices came from them. How should this affect how much value we give early Christian writings compared with later theology or today’s church preferences?

Direct Answer

Bercot’s argument suggests early Christian writings should carry significant weight because they preserve the beliefs and practices of generations closer to the apostles. While he does not say they replace Scripture, he presents them as historically important testimony for identifying apostolic tradition.

Support from Transcript

- He asks how later generations knew Paul’s oral teaching, answering that each generation would ask the one before it. - He says we have "a historical record of the beliefs and practices of those early generations of Christians." - He claims apostolic tradition is "better attested to than most other historical facts." - He says early Christians claimed their "teachings, practices, and ordinances" came from the apostles. - He stresses, "They were in a position to make that claim. We aren't." - He urges believers to "look at the historic record" to uncover authentic apostolic tradition.

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript still keeps Scripture central: apostolic tradition confirms and clarifies Scripture, rather than introducing unrelated doctrines or moral teachings.