Direct Answer
According to Bercot’s argument, modern Christianity might be less divided and more consistent if believers consulted early Christian testimony before creating new doctrines or practices. He suggests that many splits could have been avoided by seeking the apostolic tradition already preserved in the historic record.
Support from Transcript
- He says "virtually all of our Church splits over the past 500 years have been over matters that were covered by apostolic tradition." - He argues it is "common sense" to determine "what the traditions of the apostles were and to follow them." - He says the early Christians claimed their "teachings, practices, and ordinances" were handed down by the apostles. - He emphasizes that "they were in a position to make that claim" while "we aren't." - He calls it "the sensible thing" and "the humble thing" to look at the historic record.
Discussion Follow-ups
The transcript does not spell out exactly how denominations would change, but it implies fewer divisions, less speculation, and more deference to early apostolic practice.