Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The discussion of the Phoenix bird shows early Christians using a widely believed ancient legend as an illustration of the resurrection while still submitting to Scripture where their culture conflicted with it; how should this shape our expectations of early Christian writers as helpful witnesses but not inspired authorities?
Another way to ask: Early Christians used the popular legend of the Phoenix bird to explain the resurrection, but they still followed Scripture when culture disagreed with it. How should this shape the way we see early Christian writers as helpful witnesses, but not inspired authorities?

Direct Answer

This should lead us to value early Christian writers as historical witnesses while not expecting them to be free from the scientific assumptions of their age. The transcript presents them as helpful but uninspired, unlike the New Testament writers whose writings were protected from such errors.

Support from Transcript

- Bercot says the early Christian writings “are not inspired.” - Therefore, “they reflect all the scientific notions of their age, except where those notions expressly conflict with Scripture.” - He explains that the Phoenix was “a legend that was widely believed in the ancient world.” - Early Christians “saw in the Phoenix bird a representation of the resurrection from the dead.” - Bercot asks, “Why should we expect anything different? Again, these were real people living in a real world.” - He adds, “The only difference is that the Holy Spirit kept scientific errors out of the New Testament.”

Discussion Follow-ups

The transcript’s balance is important: early Christian writers can illuminate ancient Christian thought, but they should not be treated as inspired Scripture.