Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Justin Martyr frames baptism as becoming “children of choice and knowledge” rather than “necessity and ignorance”—what does that imply about repentance, personal agency, and catechesis before baptism, and how does it compare to baptizing people with minimal instruction?
Another way to ask: If baptism is for people choosing a new life with understanding, what does that say about repentance and learning before baptism? How does that compare to baptizing someone with little teaching first?

Direct Answer Justin’s language implies baptism normally followed a personal decision, repentance, and some understanding—becoming “children of choice and knowledge.” That contrasts with later patterns Bercot describes where people were baptized mechanically, even forcibly, or with little evidence of repentance.

Support from Transcript:

  • Justin explains baptism to the emperor: people move from being born “without our own knowledge or choice” to becoming “children of choice and knowledge.”
  • Justin ties it to moral response: remission is for “him who chooses to be born again and has repented of his sins.”
  • Bercot emphasizes Acts’ pattern: Peter did not lead an “invite Jesus into your heart” prayer; he said, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized… for the remission of sins.”
  • Origen: “the benefit of baptism is connected with the intention of the baptized person. To him who repents, it is saving.”
  • Bercot criticizes later practice: churches imagined you could baptize people and “presto out comes a born again Christian.”
  • He describes forced/mandatory baptism: Justinian required every newborn infant to be baptized; kings required whole populations to be baptized.
Discussion Follow-ups What kind of preparation would help baptism be an act of “choice and knowledge” in your setting? How much instruction is enough to avoid mechanical baptism without turning it into endless delay?