Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 8
The lesson claims early Christians wouldn’t go to court, wouldn’t watch gladiator games or executions, and avoided violence and bloodshed broadly—not only war; what modern practices (entertainment, politics, online behavior, career choices) might be closer to those ancient spectacles than we want to admit?
Another way to ask: If early Christians avoided courts, violent shows, and public killings, what things today might be our version of those spectacles? Which parts of entertainment, politics, online life, or careers might involve violence more than we want to admit?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point suggests Christians should examine any modern habit that normalizes violence, revenge, or enjoyment of bloodshed—whether in entertainment, public outrage, or using institutions to harm others. The transcript doesn’t list modern equivalents, but it clearly describes the early Christians’ broad refusal to participate in violent culture.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says it wasn’t only about war: Christians followed “Do Not Resist Evil” “very literally in all kinds of areas.”
  • He states they “would not take their fellow man to court,” generally not even an unbeliever.
  • They “refused to watch the gladiator games where men were being put to death.”
  • They wouldn’t attend “public execution,” which was normal entertainment in that era.
  • He summarizes: they wanted “nothing to do with violence or bloodshed.”
  • Even under persecution, they preferred to “flee” if possible, and if not, “preferred to die than to kill another man.”
Discussion Follow-ups If the early Christians avoided even watching violence, what does that suggest about how we should think about violence-as-entertainment or outrage-as-entertainment today?