Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Christian Citizenship  /  War  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 2
The lesson highlights Isaiah/Micah’s “swords into plowshares” prophecy and says early Christians believed it was fulfilled “right now” in the church rather than in a future millennium; what would it look like for your congregation to treat that prophecy as present reality rather than distant hope?
Another way to ask: If “swords into plowshares” is meant to be true in the church right now, what would need to change in your congregation? What would people do differently if they treated it as a present reality?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s teaching, it would mean the congregation publicly identifies as a people who have renounced war and retaliation, actively practicing enemy-love, nonresistance, and peace as a normal Christian lifestyle—not a special calling.

Support from Transcript:

  • Justin Martyr speaks for Christians as a group: “We…now refrain from making war even upon our enemies…[and] have…changed our warlike weapons…into plowshares.” Bercot stresses he says “We,” not “I.”
  • Bercot says they saw Isaiah 2 fulfilled “right now in our lives,” “not something for the millennium.”
  • Irenaeus: Christians “formed their swords and war lances into plowshares…[and] when they are struck, they offer also the other cheek.”
  • Clement: “It is not in war, but in peace that we are trained,” and even advises daily symbols should avoid violence: “We are not to draw an outline of a sword or a bow since we follow peace.”
  • Tertullian argues Christians would rather be killed than kill: “counted better to be slain than to slay.”
Discussion Follow-ups What habits, symbols, or “normal” assumptions in church life communicate trust in force rather than training in peace?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next