Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
Bercot warns that seeing an icon or artwork “from the catacombs” doesn’t prove it’s pre-Constantinian, noting the ninth-century icon of Christ and later fourth-century galleries for services; how should this caution reshape the way Christians use history and artifacts to defend practices (like icons, relics, pilgrimages, or “ancient worship”), and what criteria should a serious disciple use to avoid building convictions on romanticized or misleading evidence?
Another way to ask: Bercot warns that art said to be “from the catacombs” might be from a later time, so it may not prove what people claim. How should this make Christians more careful when using history or artifacts to defend practices like icons or relics, and what basic rules should we use so we don’t build beliefs on weak or romantic evidence?

Direct Answer Bercot’s lesson cautions that artifacts must be dated and interpreted carefully, because later generations reshaped the catacombs and later visitors misread what they saw; therefore Christians should not defend practices simply by claiming they are “from the catacombs” or “ancient.” A serious disciple should ask what time period the evidence comes from, what the original purpose was, and whether later misunderstandings have been layered onto it.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot explains how a misunderstanding created the very word “catacombs” during the Middle Ages “through ignorance,” showing how easily history gets misread.
  • He says rooms for worship exist, but they were “mainly built after the time of Constantine,” not during persecution.
  • Later visitors saw those rooms and “imagined” Christians worshiped there during persecution—“a total misunderstanding.”
  • He notes the catacombs were extended in the 4th century under Damasus: “larger stairways… light shafts… larger galleries… so that services could be held.”
  • He describes later centuries removing bones and selling “relics,” and even tearing out painted walls—evidence that later handling can distort what remains.
Discussion Follow-ups When someone appeals to “early church art,” what questions should we ask about dating and context? How do we distinguish honoring history from using it as a shortcut for biblical discernment?