Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Reformation History  /  Lecture 8: The Early Swiss Brethren  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
Dean said he intentionally avoids “doctrinal dogma” about baptism because strict theological systems can produce another Marburg Colloquy; what do you think the early church (and later figures like Pilgrim Marpeck, as Dean mentioned) would have assumed was happening in baptism and the Lord’s Supper that modern churches often avoid talking about?
Another way to ask: Dean avoids strict dogma about baptism to prevent fights like Marburg. What do you think the early church (and people like Pilgrim Marpeck) believed was happening in baptism and the Lord’s Supper that many churches today avoid saying out loud?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests the early church (and Marpeck, in Dean’s brief comment) assumed baptism and the Lord’s Supper were more than mere reminders—“channels” where God works blessing and grace in ways that remain a “mystery”—while many modern churches avoid that language out of fear of controversy or “dogma.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean explicitly says, “The early church… certainly thought there was something happening,” referring to communion.
  • He adds that “different ones, Pilgrim Marpick, would have had a more appreciative of something deep happening in that,” signaling a deeper sacramental seriousness among some Anabaptists.
  • Dean critiques reducing the ordinances to “empty symbolism just out of obedience,” saying that may be “going a little far.”
  • He reflects on baptism debates (Baptist vs. Church of Christ) and concludes that neither side he knew truly grasped “saved by grace through faith,” while also noting “God uses these different things sometimes to give us channels of grace or blessings.”
  • He intentionally avoids “doctrinal dogma” because strict systems can spiral into division (he points back to Marburg as the cautionary example).
Discussion Follow-ups Why do modern churches often prefer minimal language (“just a symbol”) instead of “mystery” and “channels of grace”? How could we talk about spiritual depth without implying mechanical salvation?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next