Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
The turning point in Zurich was Zwingli placing reforms (including the mass) in the city council’s hands—“The city will discern how the mass should be properly observed”—prompting Simon Stump to answer, “The Spirit of God decides… if the council… decides anything contrary… I will… act against it”; what do you believe this conflict says about who has authority in the church under God, and what “city council” equivalents (denominations, boards, donors, political pressure, courts, popular opinion) most shape obedience in your own Christian world?
Another way to ask: What does the fight between the city council and people like Stump show about who should have authority in the church under God? What things today (denominations, boards, donors, politics, courts, public opinion) most shape what Christians in your world obey?

Direct Answer Based on Dean Taylor’s teaching, the conflict centers on whether the church must obey God’s Word directly or wait for civic authorities to authorize obedience; Simon Stump insists “the Spirit of God decides,” not the council. The transcript pushes readers to ask what human authorities today practically govern our obedience when Scripture has already spoken.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean calls it “an important thing” and “a precedent” when doctrinal decisions were put before the city: “the council decides to have a hearing,” and “the city was asked.”
  • At the first debate (Jan 29, 1523), the Roman representative argued such issues “cannot be decided in a city council… topics to be discussed by the church,” and Dean notes the irony that Anabaptists later press a similar concern.
  • In the second disputation, after arguing the mass was “wicked,” Zwingli still said, “The city will discern how the mass should be properly observed.”
  • Conrad Grebel objected that change should begin: it would be “futile if they did not begin to change the mass… no one… willing to stop this great abomination.”
  • Simon Stump directly challenges Zwingli: “you have no authority to place the decision in the council’s hand. For the decision is already made. The Spirit of God decides… if… contrary… I will… act against it.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do we postpone obedience today because we’re waiting for approval from leadership structures, policies, or public opinion? When Christians say, “We can’t do that here,” is it sometimes another form of letting the ‘council’ decide what God has already decided?