Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 5

The Waldensian-related Bécaires/Begins built practical systems to care for the poor, seemingly driven by Matthew 25; what does that imply about God’s priorities at the judgment, and how does Dean’s comment (“In America, we kind of put our poor in far-off countries”) challenge the way we mentally distance ourselves from responsibility?

Another way to ask: The Bécaires/Begins created practical ways to care for the poor, inspired by Matthew 25. What does that suggest God will care about at judgment, and how does Dean’s comment about sending our poor “far off” challenge how we avoid responsibility?

Direct Answer Dean’s connection to Matthew 25 implies that care for the needy is not optional—it is tied to how people think about the “great judgment day.” His America comment challenges the habit of pushing poverty out of sight so that it “doesn’t even cross our mind” as a local responsibility.

Support from Transcript:

He explains that the Bécaires/Begins were linked to Waldensian influence and built “almshouses…where persons…were given a living,” providing “enormous” social service.
Dean explicitly ties their actions to Matthew 25: “Think for a minute with the Matthew 25…They thought that was important and made a separate little room or place where they would help the poor.”
He contrasts their mindset with modern distance: “In America, we kind of put our poor in far-off countries.”
He asks probing questions: “But is it part of our thinking? Does it even cross our mind…how could we do something to help them?”
He portrays their poor-care as an outworking of “ponder[ing]…that great judgment day,” suggesting judgment priorities include practical mercy.

Discussion Follow-ups Dean doesn’t argue against helping far-off places; he questions whether distance becomes an excuse. What local needs do we avoid because they would cost us time, money, or comfort?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 5 of 10