Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
Dean Taylor repeats Charles Hamilton’s line “Ideas have consequences” and adds that ideas “produce a people” and “produce a heart”; where did you see that principle playing out in the groups he described (Waldensians, Bécaires/Begins, Brethren of the Common Life), and what consequences do you think modern evangelical “ideas” are producing right now?
Another way to ask: Dean says “ideas have consequences” and even shape people’s hearts. How did you see that in the Waldensians, Bécaires/Begins, and the Brethren of the Common Life, and what do you think today’s evangelical ideas are producing now?

Direct Answer Dean Taylor shows that when people treated Jesus’ words as real, their ideas became visible communities—shaping habits of mercy, discipline, and inward devotion. The transcript critiques “mediocre Christianity” and implies that modern evangelical ideas may be producing a comfortable faith that doesn’t generate costly discipleship.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean repeats, “Ideas have consequences,” then adds that ideas “produce a people… [and] produce a heart,” meaning beliefs eventually form lived culture.
  • He says if we used Scripture “as a blueprint” and truly believed Jesus meant His words, it “comes out in many of these ways”—the small communities trying to obey Christ.
  • On the Waldensians/Bécaires: they built almshouses and were “helping the poor,” doing “an enormous amount of social service,” tied to Matthew 25 judgment thinking.
  • On the Brethren of the Common Life: they pursued “a truly pious Christian life,” “actively engaged…especially in education,” with strict community rhythms and public meetings.
  • Dean contrasts these examples with “a white vanilla…plain, mediocre Christianity,” asking, “is anybody even trying anymore?”
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t list today’s evangelical “ideas” by name, but it invites the group to ask: do our beliefs produce compassion, holiness, and sacrifice—or only talk and routine?