Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
The lesson repeatedly returns to the question, “What does it really mean to be a Christian?” in connection with Constantine, Arius, and later creedal enforcement. Using the transcript’s examples, what markers of “real Christianity” does Dean imply were being lost, and which of those markers would make modern churches (including conservative ones) uncomfortable?
Another way to ask: From the examples about Constantine, Arius, and enforced creeds, what signs of “real Christianity” does Dean suggest were being lost? Which of those would make churches today (even conservative ones) uncomfortable?

Direct Answer Dean implies “real Christianity” is centered on being “born from God,” actually following Christ’s kingdom teachings (especially the Sermon on the Mount), and living crucified, humble, holy lives—not merely holding correct slogans, winning debates, or enforcing identity markers. Those markers become uncomfortable because they demand heart-change (visiting the sick, helping the poor, humility) rather than arguing fine points.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean asks: “What does it really mean to be a Christian?… born from God… truly a follower of Christ.”
  • He contrasts earlier witness (Justin Martyr’s description of purity and care for the poor) with Constantine accepting a cheaper “arranged” faith.
  • He says the “Sermon on the Mount [was] crying out to be heard again,” but “the target had moved… now the creed was the emphasis.”
  • The council era becomes public tribalism (blue/green ribbons), implying identity replaced “engrafted nature of Christ.”
  • The class notes it’s easier to debate “white shoe” issues than deeper obedience; “It requires a circumcised heart.”
  • David Bercot quote: no one was persecuted for “not helping the poor, not visiting the sick”—suggesting those obvious markers were neglected.
Discussion Follow-ups Which is easier for us to measure—correctness or Christlikeness? What would happen if our “real Christianity” test centered on obedience to Jesus’ everyday commands?