Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
The transcript quotes, “As non-resistance was love’s negative expression, missions became its positive affirmation”; how does that definition of love confront both (a) political activism that relies on coercion and (b) private spirituality that avoids costly engagement with neighbors?
Another way to ask: If non-resistance is love saying “no” to violence and missions is love saying “yes” to action, how does that challenge politics that uses force? How does it also challenge a private faith that avoids costly help for neighbors?

Direct Answer In Dean Taylor’s framing, love refuses coercion (non-resistance) but also refuses passivity; it moves outward in mission to bring people into Christ’s kingdom. That confronts coercive activism by rejecting the sword as a tool of the kingdom, and confronts private spirituality by insisting love must actively seek the neighbor’s salvation and good.

Support from Transcript:

  • Taylor highlights the quote: “As non-resistance was love’s negative expression, missions became its positive affirmation.”
  • He describes the world’s order as “ran by law…ran by fear of law…ran by the sword,” contrasted with the implanted kingdom Christians must represent now.
  • He says they “propagate the kingdom” because of “passionate love for God and their neighbor.”
  • He presents mission as concrete action, not talk: “don’t just talk about it, do it,” contrasting with mission conferences that can become self-satisfying.
  • He quotes Menno Simons’ costly model of love: preaching “in prisons…in water and in fire…with possessions and blood, with life and death,” wanting to “save all mankind…for this is the true nature of the love which is of God.”
  • He notes they did not separate gospel proclamation from caring for needs (poor/sick), implying love includes both.
Discussion Follow-ups Where are we tempted to use pressure, politics, or control to get “Christian” outcomes? Where are we tempted to call quietness “peace” when it may actually be avoidance of mission?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next