Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 2
Boettner frames Augustine as the one who “revived true religion” between “Paul and Luther”; what view of church history (and of God’s faithfulness to preserve truth) is required for that storyline to be persuasive, and what alternative storyline does Finny suggest by contrasting Augustine with earlier sources?
Another way to ask: If Augustine “revived true religion” between Paul and Luther, what does that assume about church history and God keeping truth alive? What different story does Finny point to when he compares Augustine with earlier Christian writings?

Direct Answer For Boettner’s storyline to work, you must believe the church largely lacked “sound doctrine” on predestination until Augustine, and then again needed a later revival through Luther—meaning preservation of truth is tied to a few towering individuals rather than widespread early consensus. Finny counters by spotlighting earlier Greek-speaking writers (Clement, Tertullian, Origen, Lactantius) who strongly affirm free will and responsibility, suggesting Augustine is not “the early church” baseline.

Support from Transcript:

  • Boettner says Augustine “first clearly” saw this “cardinal truth,” taught “unconditional election,” and “restricted the purposes of redemption to the definite circle of the elect.”
  • Boettner claims Augustine contributed more to “sound doctrine…than did those of any other man between Paul and Luther.”
  • Finny summarizes Boettner: early church “missed the mark,” then Augustine “revived true Christianity,” then there’s “another jump to Luther.”
  • Finny quotes Clement of Rome (~95 AD): “man has been made possessed of free will…He who is made good by another under necessity is not really good.”
  • Tertullian: “Entire freedom of will…as master of himself…not…through necessity and not choice.”
  • Origen criticizes a view that “destroy[s] free will” with “ruined natures incapable of salvation” and the “cannot be lost” idea.
Discussion Follow-ups Is it more persuasive that truth was “rediscovered” late, or that Augustine introduced significant novelties? How much weight should “earliest witnesses” carry compared with later systematic theology?