Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Strength to Strength / S2S Sisters: Bonus Talk: "Navigating the Seasons: A Discussion on Purposeful Motherhood"
Watch Full Video
Question 10
In the technology discussion, Valerie’s boundaries include “no phones in the bedroom,” “no phones during family times,” and “no texting the opposite gender,” while Lindsay compares internet access to giving a child a “chainsaw”; what underlying theology of human nature, temptation, and discipleship do these rules assume, and where do they confront common evangelical ideas about freedom, maturity, and “just teach them to make good choices”?
Another way to ask: They set strict phone and internet rules and compare internet access to giving a kid a chainsaw. What do these rules assume about human nature, temptation, and discipleship, and how do they challenge common evangelical ideas about freedom, maturity, and “just teach them to choose well”?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
These rules assume children (and adults) are vulnerable to temptation and need external structure, not just internal good intentions. The transcript frames discipleship as protective training: technology is powerful and can be used for “good or evil,” so maturity is guided, delayed, and modeled—not presumed.

Support from Transcript:
  • Lindsay’s analogy: you wouldn’t give a child “a chainsaw” and expect them to “figure out how to use it,” implying technology requires guarded instruction.
  • She calls smartphones/internet “a powerful tool… used for good… [or] a lot of evil,” assuming real spiritual danger.
  • She recommends educating children early so it’s not a mystery-driven craving: not “I can’t wait till I can get my smartphone.”
  • Valerie delays phones until “they’re driving alone,” and “no internet on it until they’re older,” showing staged access as discipleship.
  • Valerie’s boundaries—“no phones in the bedroom,” “no phones during… meal times,” and “no texting the opposite gender”—assume temptation increases in privacy and unsupervised relational access.
  • Christina adds modeling matters because children can’t tell whether you’re doing good or wasting time: “To them, it’s no different… me staring at this phone.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you rely too heavily on “they’ll make good choices” without building protective structure? If technology is a “chainsaw,” what training steps (modeling, filters, passwords, shared spaces) should come before freedom?
Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Previous All Questions Next