Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer
Question 8
The speaker frames reckless gathering not as “bold faith” but as sin: “we do not put God to the test,” tying it to Jesus’ refusal to jump from the temple (Matthew 4:7); what practical behaviors today would count as “testing God” under his definition, and how can a person tell the difference between faith-filled action and presumption?
Another way to ask: He says reckless gathering is not brave faith but “testing God,” like when Jesus refused to jump from the temple. What actions today would count as testing God, and how can you tell the difference between real faith and foolish risk?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
Under the speaker’s definition, “testing God” is deliberately placing yourself and others in avoidable danger while claiming God must protect or heal you, instead of using available wisdom and ordinary means. Faith-filled action prays and trusts God while still obeying lawful orders, loving neighbor, and refusing unnecessary risk.

Support from Transcript:
  • He states the principle: “as Christians, we do not put God to the test.”
  • He applies it to COVID: taking it lightly—“I’m going to put myself in harm’s way and then pray to God”—is wrong.
  • He connects it to Matthew 4:7: “You shall not test the Lord your God,” referencing Satan’s temptation to jump from the temple.
  • He says presumption is “showing lack of faith” and “disobedience to God,” not courage.
  • He critiques reckless meetings even when not illegal: it’s still “putting God to the test” and “not showing love for their neighbor.”
  • He contrasts with proper practice: follow Caesar’s restrictions, practice distancing, prefer safer outdoor contact.
Discussion Follow-ups What risks do you label “faith” because you want them to be? How might love of neighbor function as a diagnostic tool for spotting presumption?