Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Question 2
Hebrews 10 is used to say animal sacrifices “reminded the Jews of their sins every year” rather than removing sin; how would that “reminder” function spiritually in Israel’s life, and how does that compare with the way confession, repentance, and assurance tend to function in many churches today?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript suggests the “reminder” functioned like a yearly, unavoidable confrontation with sin that kept Israel aware of its need for redemption and pointed forward to Christ’s perfect sacrifice. By contrast, the speaker implies many churches emphasize assurance in forgiveness without expecting deep cleansing or transformation, which can dull that conscience-level awareness.

Support from Transcript:
  • Hebrews 10:1–3 is quoted: sacrifices “can never… make those who approach perfect… in those sacrifices, there is a reminder of sins every year.”
  • He interprets that as: “They helped the Jews to see that some kind of redemption was necessary.”
  • Second purpose: the sacrifices “prefigured the sacrifice of Christ,” including the pattern of “an innocent victim… because of the sins of somebody else.”
  • He insists OT sacrifices “did not take away anyone’s sins” (Hebrews 10:4).
  • When discussing modern slogans, he critiques “Christians aren’t perfect. They’re just forgiven,” saying it implies Christians “sin just like everybody else… The only difference is that they’re forgiven.”
  • He argues early Christianity expected real cleansing: “Christ’s blood… actually cleanses us… We really are cleansed from sin.”
Discussion Follow-ups Do your church rhythms (confession, Communion, altar calls) sharpen your conscience about sin or mainly soothe it? What would it look like if your practices more intentionally pointed you to the need for real cleansing?