Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

Question 8
Jesus’ words escalate adultery to “lustful intent” and then command drastic amputation language (“tear it out…cut it off”) with hell in view; what “radical cuts” would be equivalent today (digital habits, relationships, conveniences), and what keeps Christians from obeying the spirit of this command?
Another way to ask: If Jesus says to take drastic action against lust, what “radical cuts” might that mean today (phones, apps, relationships, routines)? What usually stops Christians from doing it?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript’s logic points to removing whatever repeatedly triggers lust—especially through the eyes and hands—because Jesus treats lustful looking as heart-adultery with eternal consequences. “Radical cuts” today would reasonably include eliminating access points that feed lust and putting firm limits in place, but the transcript doesn’t list specific modern technologies.

Support from Transcript:
  • The heart-level escalation: “everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
  • The drastic language: “If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out… If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off.”
  • The reason given is eternal seriousness: “better that you lose one… than that your whole body be thrown into hell.”
  • Job’s example supports intentional restraint: “I made a covenant with my eyes not to look lustfully.”
  • A warning against overconfidence: “let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall.”
Discussion Follow-ups What are the modern equivalents of “eye” and “hand” access—what you watch and what you do? How does fear of inconvenience or social cost compare to the transcript’s emphasis on the danger of sin and the reality of hell?