Discussion Jumpstarter

Study leader reference - not a definitive answer

Question 2

In Haiti, Merle interpreted Brother Jeremy’s raised hand as a concrete commitment, while the church interpreted it as willingness (“I would come if I could”); what does that cultural moment expose about how quickly Christians can label others as dishonest, and what habits of “asking what you mean” would have prevented Merle’s mistrust?

Another way to ask: In Haiti, Merle thought the raised hand meant a firm promise, but the church meant “I’d come if I could.” What does this show about how fast Christians can call someone dishonest, and what simple questions could Merle have asked to understand the meaning?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
That moment shows how easily Christians can call something “lying” when it may be a cultural misunderstanding. The transcript points to communication—asking what a gesture or statement means—as the key habit that keeps trust from collapsing.

Support from Transcript:

Merle assumed the raised hand meant Jeremy “was physically going to come and help,” but Jeremy explained, “I raised my hand because I’m a church member… I would come if I could… everybody knows I can’t.”
The pastor confirms it: “No, he’s not going to come… It’s really good he raises his hand” because it motivates others.
Merle generalizes the danger: we can start saying, “Well, people lie… they say they’re going to come, and then they don’t come.”
He warns what follows: “maybe we didn’t understand… and then we lose trust. And when trust is lost… relationships really nosedive.”
Merle’s solution is explicit: “Communicating and finding out, ‘What didn’t I understand?’… ask people, ‘Well, what do you mean?’”

Discussion Follow-ups What “signals” in your church culture could be misunderstood by outsiders? How could leaders normalize asking clarifying questions without embarrassment?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10