Skip to content
Question 4
The speaker warns of two “ditches”: trusting education as savior (a kind of modern Gnosticism) and discarding education as suspicious; where do you see your church community drifting, and what concrete signs reveal that drift?
Another way to ask: The speaker warns about two errors: treating education like a savior, or rejecting education as dangerous. Which way is your church leaning, and what clear signs show it?
Discussion Jumpstarter

Direct Answer
The transcript gives two clear drift-patterns: either acting like education will “fix our problems,” or treating education as dangerous and trying to exclude it. A study leader would need to evaluate their own church using the speaker’s concrete signs—what the church praises, fears, and where people actually get their teaching.

Support from Transcript:
  • First ditch: thinking “education has the answers” and “if we just have enough knowledge… that is going to save us,” which he connects to “Gnosticism… salvation by knowledge.”
  • He insists education should be “a tool to serve the kingdom of God.”
  • Second ditch: discarding education as “suspicious,” looking down on people who “study and pursue.”
  • He gives a sign: people questioning Hebrew/Greek study—“what’s wrong with you? What’s wrong with the King James?”
  • Another sign: communities that “forbid people going to college” and say higher education means you “can’t be part of our communities.”
  • He warns the anti-education ditch creates a “vacuum” filled by outside voices.
Discussion Follow-ups Which ditch shows up more in our attitudes: prideful credentialing or fearful guarding? What practical policies (about books, training, preaching sources) reveal what we truly believe?