Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
The chapter identifies two roots of the theological wars: speculating about what should be left alone and losing focus on “Christ the King and His kingdom,” placing “theological dogma above kingdom fruit”—what would it look like, in concrete terms, for a church to reverse that order without sliding into indifference about truth?
Another way to ask: What would it look like for a church to focus first on Jesus and His kingdom, and then on doctrine, without acting like truth doesn’t matter?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests reversing the order means keeping the focus on “following Christ” and measurable kingdom fruit while refusing to turn unclear, “obscure” questions into public tests of faith. It does not require indifference to truth, but humility about what Scripture doesn’t explicitly define.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says the wars were fueled because Christians “were speculating on things they should have left alone.”
  • He says they “lost their focus on Christ the King and His kingdom” and were “placing theological dogma above kingdom fruit.”
  • He praises the letter’s counsel: “Just drop it and focus on following Christ. Don’t speculate on matters that aren’t specifically defined in Scripture.”
  • The letter argues these points “are not required by the authority of any law” and are too “sublime and obscure” for “popular assemblies” and “the general ear.”
  • He notes second-century believers could be mistaken (even Oneness error) without councils or excommunications, implying the Church can maintain faithfulness without forcing precision on every mystery.
Discussion Follow-ups What practices help a church keep truth tied to obedience—e.g., limiting what becomes a public controversy, and emphasizing lived allegiance to Christ?