Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Will the Theologians Please Sit Down  /  Chapter 3: The Leaven of the Theologians  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
In the “corbin” example, theologians’ teaching effectively excused adults from financially supporting parents while benefiting religious leaders; what contemporary church practices, teachings, or loopholes might similarly allow people to appear devoted to God while avoiding costly obedience—especially in money, family obligation, and care for the vulnerable?
Another way to ask: What church habits or teachings today might let people look devoted to God while avoiding hard obedience—especially with money, caring for family, and helping the vulnerable?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t name present-day examples, but it gives a clear principle: religious loopholes that sound devoted to God can actually cancel God’s commands and conveniently benefit leaders while leaving vulnerable people (like aging parents) without support.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot explains honoring parents includes “providing financial support,” so supporting aged parents was “a specific commandment of God.”
  • The theologians taught that declaring assets “corbin” meant “he didn't have to use them to support his parents.”
  • Corbin meant dedicated to God so “no third party had any claim to it,” creating a legal-religious loophole.
  • It was expected some corbin property would be donated to “the scribes and Pharisees or the synagogues they controlled,” so the system “benefited the Jewish theologians.”
  • The practice “left many of the elderly Jews destitute,” showing how “devotion” can mask selfishness.
Discussion Follow-ups What “spiritual” spending or commitments today might function like corbin—protecting our resources from the hard demands of mercy and family responsibility?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next