Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Will the Theologians Please Sit Down  /  Chapter 3: The Leaven of the Theologians  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
Jesus calls the Pharisees’ and Sadducees’ approach to interpreting Scripture “leaven” and says it is “evil in the sight of God”; what does that imply about how seriously God treats not only false conclusions but also corrupt methods of handling His word?
Another way to ask: Jesus calls their way of reading Scripture “leaven” and says it’s evil. What does that tell us about how seriously God takes not just wrong answers, but also bad ways of interpreting His Word?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, God treats corrupt ways of handling Scripture as seriously as wrong conclusions, because the “leaven” was not just one error but an entire evil approach that warps God’s purposes and harms people.

Support from Transcript:

  • Jesus’ warning is about “the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees,” and Bercot says leaven refers to “their teaching,” but “it wasn't some specific teaching… but their whole approach to teaching and interpreting the law.”
  • That approach is called “something evil in the sight of God,” showing the method itself can be evil.
  • Bercot lists “four principal evils” in their approach: missing the big picture, adding human teaching, negating commandments, and making Scripture only for an elite.
  • The result was that “the weight of the theologians’ leaven crushed the whole spirit and purpose of the law.”
  • Ultimately, “the Jewish theologians had made the Scriptures invalid because of their traditions,” meaning the method can hollow out Scripture’s meaning.
Discussion Follow-ups If a method regularly produces pride, burdens, and loopholes around obedience, should we treat it as spiritually dangerous even when it sounds Bible-based?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next