Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Will the Theologians Please Sit Down  /  Chapter 20: Counterfeit History  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
Bercot says it would be “quite dishonest” to quote the Talmud (written down around AD 500) as if it reflects first-century Jewish practice, and adds that commentators often don’t even quote Mishnah/Tosefta/Talmud but instead use medieval sources—or “make it up”; what standards should Christians hold teachers to when they claim historical background, and what concrete habits could we adopt (as readers and listeners) to resist “counterfeit history”?
Another way to ask: Bercot says it’s dishonest to quote later writings like the Talmud as if they describe first-century life, and that some teachers even rely on much later sources or guess. What standards should we expect from teachers who claim historical background, and what habits can help us avoid being misled by fake history?

Direct Answer Bercot’s standard is basic honesty about dates, sources, and certainty: teachers should not present late or speculative material as first-century fact, and they should distinguish evidence from conjecture. To resist counterfeit history, Christians should verify sources, ask “How do you know?”, and be willing to accept when Scripture and early evidence don’t answer a question.

Support from Transcript:

  • He dates the Talmud: “not written down until about AD 500,” and says it records discussions from “AD 200 to 500.”
  • He concludes it’s “of little value” for first-century beliefs and would be “quite dishonest” to cite it “as though it represents…first century” practice.
  • He notes the Mishnah dates “beginning of the third century,” and the Tosefta is a third-century supplement.
  • He says commentators’ “inside information…rarely, if ever, comes from the Mishnah or Tosefta,” and “rarely even [is] based on something in the Talmud.”
  • Often it’s from “a medieval rabbinical source…or…something they've made up.”
Discussion Follow-ups What practical steps could a group take (asking for citations, checking dates, reading primary sources where possible)? How should we respond when a teacher presents a vivid historical scene but can’t show where it comes from?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done