Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

David Bercot says he once believed “practically every word” commentators wrote because they sounded like they knew “behind-the-scenes” first-century church details; what do you think that trust was actually based on, and where are you most tempted to grant that kind of authority today?

Another way to ask: Bercot used to trust almost everything Bible commentators said because they sounded like insiders. What was that trust really based on, and where are you tempted to trust “experts” like that today?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s story, his trust was mainly based on the apparent expertise and confidence of commentators, plus the assumption that they had access to first-century sources he didn’t. The transcript doesn’t name where you personally feel that temptation today, but it implies we often grant similar authority to confident “experts” who sound like they know hidden background.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot says in his early 30s “about the only Christian works I read besides the scriptures were commentaries and similar reference works.”
He admits, “I believed practically every word that commentators wrote.”
Why? “They seemed to know so much about what was happening behind the scenes in the New Testament church.”
He assumed there was “an abundance of Jewish and Christian writings from the first century” that explained things.
The shock: “The big secret is that such first-century writings…simply don’t exist.”

Discussion Follow-ups Where do you tend to assume, without checking, that a teacher has sources “behind the scenes”? What kinds of confident details make you stop asking, “How do you know that?”

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10