Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot claims modern Christians instinctively “turn to commentaries, study Bibles,” and degree-holding experts, even though Jesus said the kingdom is hidden from “the wise and learned”; how should that warning reshape whom you trust when interpreting Scripture—and what would it look like to actually apply Jesus’ statement to your own habits?
Another way to ask: If Jesus says God’s kingdom is hidden from “the wise and learned,” how should that change who you trust when you read the Bible? What would it look like for you to change your own habit of leaning on experts and study tools first?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, Jesus’ warning should make us cautious about treating degree-holding experts as the final authority, since expertise can create a “wise and learned class” that may be blind in key areas. Applying it would mean using helps gratefully but refusing to outsource interpretation to commentators, and being willing to question them.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says Christians “typically turn to commentaries, study Bibles” and other works for “insights into what the Bible writers were saying.”
  • He questions what qualifies them, noting they claim expertise because of “advanced degrees… part of the wise and learned class, the very class from which Jesus said the kingdom was hidden.”
  • He argues commentators “use… Greek… history… historic faith” to create an impression of “hidden insights.”
  • He explicitly says Greek scholars are valuable, but “their opinions shouldn’t be accepted without question.”
  • His medical doctor analogy: doctors are “usually right,” yet he sometimes disputed and was correct—showing trust without surrender.
Discussion Follow-ups What habits would change if you treated commentaries as secondary witnesses rather than referees? Where do you rely on “expert conclusions” instead of doing your own careful reading?