Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 5

Bercot describes “kingdom Christians” (Anabaptists, Moravians, Brethren, etc.) as being silenced by centuries of persecution until they became “the quiet in the land”; how should that history affect the way you interpret today’s reluctance toward evangelism and public witness in those streams?

Another way to ask: If some “kingdom Christians” were silenced for centuries by persecution, how might that history explain why some of their groups are quiet today about evangelism and public witness? How should it change the way you judge that reluctance?

Direct Answer Bercot suggests today’s weakness in evangelism among “kingdom Christians” should be read partly as the long trauma of enforced silence—“keeping quiet” becoming a learned survival posture passed down for generations.

Support from Transcript:

He says kingdom Christians who resisted the reformers “were murdered or imprisoned in dungeons,” and survivors were “forced into submission.”
They were driven away: “remote mountainous regions or distant corners of Europe.”
They could live in a region only if they “remain quiet and not share their faith with anyone else.”
“Consequently, they eventually became the quiet in the land.”
Even after “freedom of religion,” the “effects and traumas throughout centuries of vicious bullying…continue to this day.”
He observes: “we kingdom Christians often are weak when it comes to evangelism…keeping quiet has been deeply etched into our collective physique.”

Discussion Follow-ups How might a church distinguish between humility and a trauma-shaped silence? What would healing look like without adopting the bully methods Bercot criticizes?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 5 of 10